woods · trywoods.ai/enterprise/evidence · reviewed 20 Oct 2026

Enterprise · evidence

Show the working.

Every finding is an observation, the reason it matters, the evidence with its grade, and what woods could not see. The inferences are allowed to change. The observations are not.

Get the Assessment

woods reads public pages only. It needs no credentials and nothing for IT to approve.

What woods is
woods reads the public pages of a website and reports what they contain, with the evidence for each finding. It is read-only.
This page is for
Someone who has to decide whether to trust a woods finding, or who has to carry the report to a committee.
Status
Reviewed 20 Oct 2026. Every figure carries its source, date and grade, and comes from one estate (n = 1) unless it says otherwise.
01

How a finding is built

#parts

Four parts, always in this order.

The four parts of a finding
PartWhat it holdsCan it change?
1 · ObservationWhat woods saw, in the page’s exact words, with the page it sits on.No. It is a record of a read.
2 · ReasonWhy it matters. Where this is a judgement rather than a measurement, it is labelled inferred.Yes. An inference can be revised.
3 · Evidence and gradeThe source, the date, and a grade from A to C.Only by a new read, which is a new record.
4 · What woods could not seeThe pages not read, the comparisons not made, the question it cannot answer.It shrinks as coverage grows. It is never hidden.
02

The grades

#grades

A to C are published. D is never published.

A  Our own observation

woods fetched the page and read it. Anyone who fetches the same page on the same day can see the same thing.

Example

Two live pages state different customer counts.

B  A source we have read and can name

The source is published, and we have read it ourselves. It is cited by name and date.

Example

A vendor’s own lifecycle page.

C  A secondary source

Someone else reports it and we have not read the original. It is marked as such wherever it appears.

Example

A third party’s summary of a standard.

D  Not published

A claim we cannot trace to a source is not published at any grade, and it is never presented as a finding.

Why

A guess shown as a fact is the failure this page exists to prevent.

03

One finding, shown whole

#example

Taken from case file 01: one UK health brand, one sweep, 745 pages.

A customer count, two waysCedar · coherence · CF-01 · A
1

Observation

Two pages on the same estate state different customer counts. Both were live when the estate was read.

Page A, exact wordsover 500,000 customers
Page B, exact wordsover 800,000 customers

In a report each version is shown with its page address. They are withheld here to keep the estate anonymous.

observed
2

Reason

Both statements can be true at once, because 800,000 is over 500,000. But a reader, or a retrieval system, asking how many customers the company has gets two different scales for one fact, and nothing on either page says which is current. One of them is probably out of date. That is an inference and it is labelled as one.

inferred
3

Evidence and grade

  • Sage extracted both statements from their pages, each in its exact words.
  • Cedar paired them by a fixed rule: the same statement, one figure that cannot be reconciled with the other, and subject similarity of at least 0.85.
  • This is one of 153 contradictions across 4,471 claims in that estate, 24 of them high severity.
  • Source: case file 01, published 5 Oct 2026. Grade A. n = 1.
graded A
4

What woods could not see

  • Which figure is current. Only the reader can say.
  • Pairs of statements with no wording in common. Cedar compared 20,000 candidate pairs, so the 153 contradictions are a floor, not a ceiling.
  • Any page behind a sign-in. woods reads public pages only.
stated gap

What to do with it

Text out: “over 500,000 customers” on page A or “over 800,000 customers” on page B, whichever is not current. Text in: yours to supply, because woods does not know which figure is current. Why: one figure, stated once, wherever the count appears.

CF-01 is case file 01, published 5 Oct 2026. The wording of the example is the case file’s own: “‘Over 500,000 customers’ on one page. ‘Over 800,000’ on another. Both live. Which one is current is your call.” One estate, one sweep, n = 1.

04

Taking it to a committee

#committee

Three steps, all real today. All three belong to the Assessment report.

  1. Get the Assessment and read the report

    One report per sweep, kept as a snapshot. Each aggregate states how much of the estate it covers.

    Assessment report

  2. Share a private link

    Send the report to someone with no account. They open the link and read it.

    Assessment report

  3. Download the pack

    13 documents and 4 spreadsheets, written for the people on the committee.

    Assessment report

The private link and the pack are features of the Assessment report.

05

The private link, exactly

#link
Who needs an account
Nobody. The recipient opens the link.
What they are sent
A snapshot: the report as it stood when the link was made. It does not change afterwards.
How long it lasts
7, 30 or 90 days, chosen when the link is made. There is no option for never.
Taking it back
The sender can revoke it at any time. A revoked link stays revoked.
What the recipient sees
The report body only: the numbers and the findings, with nothing that names your organisation. Page addresses appear only if the sender chooses to include them.
How the link is kept
It is shown once, when it is made. woods stores a hash of it, not the link, so a copy of the database holds no working links. An expired, revoked and unknown link all give the same answer.
Limits
Up to 25 live links per report. woods counts views and the time of the last one. It does not record who viewed.
06

The pack

#pack

13 documents and 4 spreadsheets in one zip, built in your browser.

What the pack contains
ForDocument
EveryoneA start-here index, and the same index as plain text.
Decision makersA two-page executive summary: the verdict and the decisions.
Five named readers5 one-page summaries: management, CEO, CFO, CTO and content lead.
The team doing the workA technical report with every finding and the method and its limits, and the ranked actions, in a document and as a spreadsheet.
AnalystsThree spreadsheets: findings by page, contradictions, and what each agent read and could not.
AnyoneThree short pages on who woods is, how it works and how to reach it.

You choose a scope when you download. The Summary scope leaves out page addresses and quoted text, so it is the one to forward. The Full scope includes them, for the team that has to fix the pages.

Read it on your own estate, then forward the report.

The report shows you findings built this way on your own pages. The private link and the pack belong to the Assessment report.

Get the Assessment · £499

Questions, or a figure you want sourced: use the contact line on the team page.